So simple and direct.
An artist agrees to sit still in a space, across from anyone who cares
to sit in her presence, every day for going on 70 days. An ordeal, a stunt, the distillation of
a body of work to its most essential.
Marina Abramovic: the Artist is
Present charts the progress of artist Abramovic’s title piece for her
monumental retrospective of performance art held at MOMA in New York in 2010.
Near the end of the film of the same title, the show’s
curator Klaus Biesenbach describes the work as self-portraiture. The art and artist are inseparable, both
are present simultaneously.
Through her physical, live presence and mute stillness, Abramovic is
both art object and art maker. The human aspect of her feat is never absent;
she is adamant about the mental preparation necessary for the work of being
present to thousands of visitors.
And watching her with a succession of sitters, the effect is
unquestioningly moving. Many
sitters find tears welling up and trickling down their faces. Is it the cumulative exhaustion of
waiting for their time with the artist?
Or does the simple act of undiminished presence—minus distraction or
digression—move people in unexpected ways?
When a young woman, inspired by Abramovic’s work and
example, attempts an intervention of her own, she — like another would-be art
upstager — is removed. Where the male interventionist wants to confront Abramovic wearing a screened image over
his face —providing another layer of comment or response to her work—the young
would-be nudist seems less calculated, more naively in thrall to what she
perceives as an opportunity to be spontaneous and “in the moment.” There’s a part of me that questions why
the security guards don’t permit her to remain. Do they fear the work becoming some sort of sideshow, with
sitters using their turn with Abramovic to perform bizarre stunts? These two viewers want to turn
the gallery into an ersatz theatre, adding themselves as performers to what is
already a carefully calibrated performance.
Looking at art when the art can also look back, breathe, and
emote. That’s what “The Artist is
Present” is all about. In every
way, this piece is a summation of Abramovic’s work, paring back her earlier provocative,
often disturbing pieces, to their minimal essence: viewer and art. No noise, distractions, props, and
only minimal movement. By taking
Biesenbach’s cue in titling the retrospective The Artist is Present, Abramovic
underlines the quintessential aspect of all art: its relationship to the viewer. In this particular case, however, it
also speaks to the endurance of the artist herself, whose performance exists
only in time, not space.
The conundrum of how a performance artist survives within a
commodified art market is touched on by Abramovic’s gallerist. Through the sale of stills of her
performance pieces, he created a mechanism to fund her work that has since
increased in demand. In her work
and on camera, Abramovic is striking, a woman fully in control of her medium
and confident of her impact. Not
that she’s immune to nerves; days leading up to the exhibition’s opening, she
is seen vomiting and sick in bed from anxiety about the endurance test
ahead. One of the most moving
encounters during The Artist is Present occurs
near the beginning when Ulay, her former partner and collaborator of twelve
years, sits across from her. As
she opens her eyes and recognizes him, tears well in her eyes as they do in
his. Breaking from her posture of
stillness, she reaches across the table for his outstretched hands. Applause breaks across the
gallery.
The glimpses of their work together—along with hints at
their life as a couple—are tantalizing.
Abramovic was clearly the instigator of several of the pieces. Her strength and stamina—a legacy of
her war hero parents—are acknowledged by Ulay who found himself unable to
withstand the physical toll of "Nightsea Crossing." In that piece, Ulay and Abramovic silently fasted across
from each other sitting at a table, in some durations, for several weeks at a time. Later in the film, Ulay addresses the
distance Abramovic has travelled in her career, her dedication to her art, the
fact that she, unlike other contemporaries, is still making demanding performances. If there’s a touch of envy of her fame
and comfortable stature—we see her delight in designer couture—there is also
respect and admiration.
If she were not so seductive—Biesenbach astutely describes
his relationship with Abramovic as an affair—the artist would seem dauntingly
formidable. Moments of humour and
candour go far in leavening the rigorous discipline and determination that feed
her work. It’s heartening to catch
a glimpse of her at play with David Blaine, a magician, who wants to stage
something “special” for the exhibition.
When her gallerist hears of Blaine’s proposal, he immediately shuts it
down and Abramovic agrees. With a
history of work taking performance art’s examination of the body to dangerous
extremes, Abramovic is alert to her gallerist’s distinction between her work’s
reputation for absolute reality and magic’s true claim to illusion.
That art was once entirely illusionistic seems largely old
hat. Yet watching footage of
Abramovic’s earlier work and recreations of her historic pieces where the
performers are mostly nude, connections with the-Nude-in art are hard to
miss. If the radical performance
artists of the ‘60’s and ‘70’s sought to attack the nude as subject, the
cumulative effect of Abramovic’s work seems to have revived what might
otherwise have seemed academic.
Having to literally walk through the narrow space between a nude couple
facing each other, museum visitors must come in physical contact with one or
both nudes.
While the bane of performance art may always be the ease
with which it can be dismissed as a stunt, The
Artist is Present shows a range of viewer responses that the apparently
average 30-second view of traditional paintings and sculpture does not enjoy. Confronted by art, with the
artist, present, so-called ordinary folk are moved by what is a unique and
personal experience.